Judges are seeing more AI-related errors in legal filings, as highlighted in a recent Above the Law article. Specifically, the article highlights the issue of false case citations in legal filings, stressing that the root of the problem is careless lawyering, not the generative AI tools themselves.
Judges are increasingly frustrated by error-filled submissions, often containing fictional case names and citations. While it is tempting to blame technology, particularly generative AI, the article argues that the responsibility for verifying accuracy lies with legal professionals, not the tools they use. One judge who has encountered this issue repeatedly emphasizes that due diligence and professional judgment are essential in legal practice, and that the solution lies in better lawyering, not better technology.
We have always maintained that technology like AI will not replace legal professionals but is best used to enhance their work. However, it takes two to tango.
Article Link: https://lnkd.in/emBVZehz
